banner



Home  ›  What Might Be The Reason That The School Forbids The Use Of Cell Phone Cameras?

What Might Be The Reason That The School Forbids The Use Of Cell Phone Cameras?

Written By Wednesday, March 16, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Overview of the use of mobile phones in schools

Photograph of a phone cage used for storing students' phones during school hours

A telephone muzzle used for keeping students' phones away from them during school hours.

The apply of mobile phones in schools has become a controversial topic debated by students, parents, teachers and authorities.

People who back up the use of mobile phones believe that these phones are essential for safety past allowing children to communicate with their parents and guardians, could simplify many schoolhouse matters, and information technology is important in today's world that children larn how to bargain with new media properly as early on as possible. Many persons also think that y'all should have reward of the fact that present, there is no demand to memorize every fact anymore, as prison cell phones can be used to admission all man knowledge virtually anywhere, assuasive schools to shift their focus from imparting cognition to understanding how certain things work together and promoting the development of personality, teamwork, creativity, social skills etc.

Opponents of students using mobile phones during school believe that mobile phones cause disruption and may exist used inappropriately such as by cheating on tests, taking inappropriate photographs,[one] and playing mobile games. Rather than paying attending to teachers, students are spending more than time distracted by their phones.

To prevent distractions caused by mobile phones, some schools have implemented policies that restrict students from using their phones during school hours. Some administrators take attempted cell phone jamming, but this exercise is illegal in certain jurisdictions. The software can be used in order to monitor and restrict phone usage to reduce distractions and prevent unproductive use. However, these methods of regulation raise concerns virtually privacy violation and abuse of power.[ii] [3]

Studies [edit]

A 2015 report published in the periodical Computers in Human Behavior demonstrated that amid undergraduate students total usage of mobile phones, measured in number of minutes per day and non limited to school fourth dimension, was "a significant and negative predictor of college students' academic performance, which was objectively measured s cumulative GPA."[4] Moreover, the arable use of mobile technology among young people largely explains the inadequate use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in both personal and school environments. Consequently, deportment have been taken that contribute to more than responsible apply of this blazon of technology in students' personal, schoolhouse, and social lives.[five]

In 2015, Dakota Lawson and Bruce B. Henderson performed a study to examine the relationship betwixt mobile phone use in class and data comprehension. The report involved 120 students from an introductory psychology course, mostly beginning-yr students. The issue showed that students who were texting in the class had significantly lower test scores even when the material that was presented was simple: mobile phone use in course impairs students' comprehension and performance. This study was performed after several like studies in the past and corroborated their results.[6]

Furthermore, researchers Julia Irwin and Natasha Gupta of Macquarie University performed an experiment in 2016 testing the upshot of Facebook-related distractions in the classroom. The researchers constitute that students who were interested in the subject material and the way it was presented were less likely to exist distracted past Facebook. However, the students with access to phones nevertheless performed poorer than students that were not allowed access to cell phones during the lecture.[7]

A 2017 collective written report, published by Applied Cognitive Psychology, indicated that college students retained less cognition when immune to use or possess a cell phone during lectures. During the experiment, students who were not allowed access to a cell telephone tested better than those who had access to prison cell phones.[viii]

Despite the numerous drawbacks that come up with the employ of jail cell phones in classrooms, there are benefits to having them available in a schoolhouse setting. In 2017, Dr. James Derounian conducted a study involving a hundred participants at the Academy of Gloucestershire. His report revealed that 45% of students believe that the use of phones in classrooms supports their education. One of the most commonly mentioned ways that phones provided such academic support was digital access to textbooks. The ability to access scholarly material on mobile devices immune students to appoint more securely with the information presented. Still, Derounian mentioned that there could be "an element of social desirability conveyed in the student views given."[9]

An article by Emma Henderson, a journalist for the Britain (UK) publication The Contained, describes phantom vibrations acquired by "learned bodily behavior," where the part of the body to which the phone is closest becomes very sensitive. Every bit a result, even the slightest vibrations tin can crusade a person to believe that the phone has vibrated when, in reality, it has non. These are known as phantom vibrations. Nine out of ten people claimed to have felt these phantom vibrations in their pockets, raising serious concerns about the overuse of cell phones and the resulting dependency that people develop. Therefore, breaking the habit of often checking one's phone tin can not only be benign for students merely also convey more than respect towards the professors and teachers whose lectures are constantly interrupted by cellular distractions.[ten]

Regulations by country [edit]

Australia [edit]

In Australian schools mobile phones are advised to be used just in case of calls to parents or guardians and that only if the parent or guardian allows the phone to exist used to during school activities such as school excursions, camps and extra-curricular activities at school.

Mobile phones with cameras are restricted within schoolhouse premises while entirely banned within sure sections such every bit changing rooms, bathrooms, gyms and swimming pools. They are only immune to pic or have photographs of people only with their signed permission or, if the person is under eighteen,[xi] to have a parent or guardian to give a sign permission note allowing for these actions. If a pupil is found with a mobile phone or devices inside these areas, they will exist confiscated; and, depending on the situation, charges or consequences will be given.

Mobile phones are not allowed to be used for sending harassing or threatening messages. If a student does commit such an human action, higher authorities will go involved, including the police since this being a violation of privacy and harassment. Due to bullying, privacy and harassment issues existence a major issue in Australia, if a student or teacher does break this police force, it may leave them with a criminal record, leaving them at a disadvantage in the future.

Mobile phones are discouraged in terms of their use within the classroom unless they tin can be appropriately incorporated into the learning surroundings. "Nosotros want to ensure mobile phones and other smart devices complement students' learning and are handled at schoolhouse in an historic period-appropriate way," said Premier Gladys Berejiklian in an ABC news article.[12]

Australian educational institutes accept been divided on whether phones should actually be banned in the classrooms or only allowed to exist used for certain amounts of time during schoolhouse hours, just the New South Wales government has banned phones completely from its primary schools since 2019. "Engineering science should be in that location to assist a kid acquire. Information technology should not be in that location to upset them or make them feel uncomfortable," according to Premier Gladys Berejiklian.

The reason for banning phones is to terminate bullying both online and physically and to remove distractions from the classrooms. "Mobile phones, unfortunately, are not only distracting merely also causing stress for young children—and nosotros can't take that continue," NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian told Seven's Sunrise.[13] This will be implemented by removing students' access to phones during the day unless a parent or guardian requests that the student needs to employ it. The teacher volition always have the phone kept with him somewhere where the pupil is all the same able to admission it before and later on school.

China [edit]

Ever since November 2018, all primary and secondary schools in China's Shandong province have banned the use of mobile phones in classrooms.[14] In February 2021, Communist china announced that children would be banned from using mobile phones in schools unless they have written parental consent.

France [edit]

Mobile phones accept been prohibited for students from 3 to 15 years of age, since September 2018.[15] In December 2017, the minister of teaching Jean-Michel Blanquer issued a directive banning the utilize of smartphones in schools past children up to the historic period of 15.[16]

Hellenic republic [edit]

It is forbidden past law and the use of mobile phones by students is not allowed in the school premises to either take or make mobile phone calls, texting, or the utilise of other photographic camera, video or other recording devices or medium that have image and audio processing system like smartwatches, headphones. Students must switch off their mobile phones or gear up to silent fashion and keep them in their bags.[17] [18] [xix] [20]

Iran [edit]

In Iran, students are not allowed to bring their phones to school; the punishment of doing so is 3 to seven days of intermission.

Some schools may confiscate students mobile phone until the academic year ends.

Malaysia [edit]

For schools nether the Malaysian Ministry of Education, it is a disciplinary offence for students to bring their phones to schoolhouse as well as to the dormitories of boarding schools.[21] Students are expected to use the school'southward public phones or borrow a teacher'southward mobile phone in the case of an emergency.[21] Phones brought to school will exist confiscated and the parents of the students who brought the phones will exist notified to recollect the phones.[21] If the educatee is a first-fourth dimension offender, a alarm will be issued. The student and their parents volition also have to sign a letter of undertaking (Malay: surat aku janji, lit.'I promise alphabetic character') in which the educatee promises not to bring their telephone to school again.[21] If the student is a repeating offender, they volition be restricted from using schoolhouse or dormitory facilities or volition be excluded from school programs or activities.[21] The standard operating procedures and punishments nonetheless, may vary past schoolhouse.[ commendation needed ]

Turkmenistan [edit]

Since 2020, all secondary schools in Turkmenistan have banned the use of mobile phones during lessons in society to increase the productivity of the educational process. The ban applies not but to schoolchildren, just also to teachers: now, during the lessons, they must put their phones on silent manner. Pupils tin can only use phones outside the school.[22]

United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland [edit]

In the UK, a survey showed that there were no mobile telephone bans in schools in 2001 but past 2007, 50% of schools had banned mobile phones during the school day. This number increased to 98% past 2012. These bans were implemented by either forbidding students from bringing phones onto schoolhouse premises or past making students mitt their phones in at the beginning of the twenty-four hours.[23] According to a study by the London Schoolhouse of Economic science, students' academic operation improved when policies were implemented to ban cell phone usage in schools. This ban not only helped students score college on exams but also reduced the students' temptation to use prison cell phones for non-scholarly purposes.[24]

Secondary schools are introducing new, strict laws on mobile phones where students under sixteen years of historic period will have to put their phones away for the unabridged 24-hour interval afterwards scientific evidence has demonstrated that students go more sociable, alert and active in the school surroundings without them.[25] Students place their phones inside a registered locker when they arrive at schoolhouse and are only allowed to retrieve them in one case schoolhouse has finished. With this happening, schools have constitute a positive bear on on the students: more students are agile outside, along with greater numbers attending clubs and social events. Nick Gibb told The Times, "I believe very strongly that children should be limiting their own [phone] apply at home. Every hr spent online and on a smartphone is an hour less talking to family, and it's an hour less exercise and it's an hour less sleep. And of course, it is a lack of sleep that research is showing can take a damaging result on a child's mental health."[26]

The schools did note that the positive impact was greater for students under the age of eleven rather than in older students. In fact, information technology was shown that older students really suffered from a restricted use of learning platforms on their phones such as educational apps profitable in studying or learning skills.[27] Students that were caught with their mobile phones between the schoolhouse fourth dimension period were given punishments such every bit detention, expulsion or warnings. In doing so, children have been taught to limit the amount of time they spend online and focus more on their school lives forth with other social activities. Nevertheless, people in England have argued against this. Patsy Kane has stated, "There's a fantastic range of apps now for revision—and the students are really motivated to use them."[28]

United States [edit]

In the by, some United States schools installed mobile phone jammers to prevent prison cell phones from working on campuses.[29] However, the sale and use of jammers is illegal in the United states under the Federal Communications Human action of 1934, because jammers cut off ix-1-1 calls and tin disrupt air navigation if they are used most airports. In 2012, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) became stricter in enforcing the ban on jammers.[30] Mt. Spokane High School in Washington country once installed a jammer to forbid students from calling and text-messaging but removed the device subsequently it decided that information technology was "probably not legal" under federal police force.[31] In 2015, a Florida scientific discipline instructor received a 5-day unpaid suspension for installing a jammer in his classroom.[32]

In 2005, the New York Metropolis Department of Teaching imposed a citywide ban on mobile phones in public schools.[33] Notwithstanding, according to The New York Times, the ban was "inconsistently enforced, with some schools allowing students to carry phones as long as staff members [did] non hear or come across them, and other schools—particularly those with metallic detectors at the doors—maintaining a strict ban."[33] The ban was unpopular among parents as well because it impeded communication between them and their children.[33] In March 2015, the citywide ban was lifted,[34] with Mayor Bill de Blasio fulfilling a campaign promise.[33] Under the new policy, schoolhouse principals in consultation with teachers and parents may gear up rules on use and storage of mobile phones during instructional time and dejeuner breaks.[34] [33] While the default rule is that phones must remain hidden, principals may also elect to "require students to store phones in backpacks or other designated places, permit the utilise of phones during lunch, or allow phones to exist used for instructional purposes."[33] De Blasio said that the policy shift would allow parents to stay in meliorate bear upon with their children, specially in case of an emergency. The New York Urban center Schools Chancellor, Carmen Fariña, supported this policy by noting that the change means that students in schools with metal detectors would no longer have to pay exterior vendors to store phones for them during the school solar day.[34]

When asked which type of telephone-restriction policy they prefer, students tended to support the side that grants them the opportunity to bring mobile phones onto the school campus, arguing that phones allow them to accomplish their parents if whatsoever problem occurs. In response to the issue of parent-student communication, parents also argue that in that location is not a replacement for mobile phones and therefore that phones are an essential device for students to have accessible, raising concerns about a child in danger or not feeling safe not being able to contact a parent and receive help. Parents besides believe that giving a kid a phone teaches responsibleness.[35]

Theft of mobile phones is another business organization in some schools. In 2012, following an undercover investigation, thirteen juvenile students in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, were arrested and charged with running a cell-phone-theft band that resulted in the theft of several thousand dollars worth of mobile phones, tablets, and other electronics.[36]

An increasing number of schools are now allowing the utilize of prison cell phones as learning tools.[37] Even so, the collective use of prison cell phones in schools poses other technological challenges. Some schools reported that allowing all students to use prison cell phones at the aforementioned time slows down school bandwidth speeds, and hence some schools accept blocked phones from accessing the school Wi-Fi.[38]

Phone use in schools is not merely an issue for students and teachers simply too for other employees of educational institutions. According to the Governors Highway Safety Association, while no state bans all mobile telephone apply for all drivers, twenty states and the District of Columbia prohibit school bus drivers from using mobile phones.[39] School bus drivers have been fired or suspended for using their phones or text-messaging while driving.[40] [41]

Messaging applications [edit]

Cellphone applications have been created to support the use of phones in school environments. Equally of February 2018, about fourscore,000 applications are available for teacher employ.[42] A variety of messaging apps provide communication for student-to-student relationships too as teacher-to-student communication. Some popular apps for both students, teachers, and parents are Remind and ClassDojo. Nearly 72% of top-selling education apps on iOS are for preschoolers and uncomplicated schoolhouse students.[43] These apps offer many different services such as linguistic communication translation, scheduled reminders and messages to parents.

The app Remind is another way for teachers to communicate with parents and school administration. This app non only allows teachers to transport out scheduled text letters to parents but too provides a class blog for teachers to share upcoming due dates, tests and quizzes, and other grade information.

Another app that allows students to communicate with one some other is GroupMe. GroupMe allows students to communicate in a group-chat format through Wi-Fi instead of using cellular data. Even some college-aged students use this app for sharing grade information.[44]

Engineering science in schools is becoming a common academic feature throughout many grade levels and historic period groups. The creation of messaging applications helps support this boom of telephone usage in schools. An advantage of messaging apps is their easy usage and accessibility for students, teachers, and parents.[43] These apps make efficient communication easier for parents with disabilities, parents with demanding full-time jobs, or parents with linguistic communication barriers.[45] One disadvantage to cell phone usage in schools is that not all students and parents have this technology bachelor to them. This can crusade a socioeconomic gap between students who have prison cell phones and computers and those who do non. Another trouble is that the ease of sharing of information tin can lead to academic dishonesty. Colleges and universities, in particular, have had many issues with academic dishonesty by digital sharing of tests and other sensitive materials. As a outcome, these institutions are becoming more than strict with their policies and increasing the severity of consequences for committing plagiarism and other acts of academic dishonesty.east

With time, messaging applications will be consistently improved. If administrators, teachers, and policy-makers work hard to minimize both student and parent entitlement, set communication boundaries, country expectations early, and reinforce student responsibility, some of the bug caused by messaging apps can exist reduced or eliminated.[45]

See too [edit]

  • Mobile learning
  • Social media in education

References [edit]

  1. ^ Essex, Nathan 50. (2013). The 200 Virtually Frequently Asked Legal Questions for Educators. Simon and Schuster. pp. 64–66. ISBN978-1-62087-520-9.
  2. ^ Magid, Larry (April xiv, 2016). "School Software Walks The Line Between Rubber Monitor And 'Parent Over Shoulder'". Forbes . Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  3. ^ Cook, Henrietta (July 16, 2017). "How schools are tracking students using their mobile phones". The Historic period . Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  4. ^ Lepp, Andrew; Barkley, Jacob E; Karpinski, Aryn C. (February 19, 2015). "The Relationship Between Jail cell Phone Employ and Academic Operation in a Sample of U.South. College Students". SAGE Open. 5 (ane): 215824401557316. doi:10.1177/2158244015573169.
  5. ^ Rodríguez-Gómez, David; Castro, Diego; Meneses, Julio (July 1, 2018). "Problematic uses of ICTs among young people in their personal and schoolhouse life" (PDF). Comunicar. 26 (56): 91–100. doi:10.3916/c56-2018-09.
  6. ^ Lawson, Dakota; Henderson, Bruce B. (3 July 2015). "The Costs of Texting in the Classroom". College Pedagogy. 63 (3): 119–124. doi:x.1080/87567555.2015.1019826. ISSN 8756-7555. S2CID 141577071.
  7. ^ Gupta, Natasha; Irwin, Julia D. (February 2016). "In-class distractions: The role of Facebook and the chief learning task". Computers in Human Behavior. 55B: 1165–1178. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.022.
  8. ^ Lee, Seungyeon; Kim, Myeong W.; McDonough, Ian M.; Mendoza, Jessica S.; Kim, Min Sung (April 17, 2017). "The Effects of Prison cell Phone Employ and Emotion‐regulation Style on College Students' Learning". Applied Cognitive Psychology. 31 (3): 360–366. doi:10.1002/acp.3323.
  9. ^ Derounian, James Garo (December 17, 2017). "Mobiles in course?" (PDF). Active Learning in Higher Education. 21 (ii): 142–153. doi:x.1177/1469787417745214. S2CID 149127592.
  10. ^ Henderson, Emma (January 10, 2016). "PHANTOM VIBRATION SYNDROME: Upward TO xc PER CENT OF PEOPLE Suffer PHENOMENON WHILE MOBILE PHONE IS IN POCKET". The Independent . Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  11. ^ "Students Using Mobile Phones". world wide web.education.vic.gov.au . Retrieved April 3, 2019.
  12. ^ McKinnell, Jamie; Tiller, Stephanie (2018-12-13). "Mobile phones will be banned in NSW primary schools from next year". ABC News . Retrieved April iii, 2019.
  13. ^ "Mobile phones banned from NSW primary schools". SBS News . Retrieved April 3, 2019.
  14. ^ "China bans mobile phones in classrooms". AsiaOne. x October 2018. Archived from the original on October thirteen, 2018. Retrieved 17 February 2020.
  15. ^ Rory Smith. "France bans smartphones from schools". CNN . Retrieved 2019-12-05 .
  16. ^ "French schools to accept choirs, but no mobile phones". French republic 24. 2017-12-11. Retrieved 2019-12-05 .
  17. ^ "Law 2472/1997 Government Gazette fifty A'/ten.04.1997" (PDF). Hellenic Data Protection Dominance (HDPA). Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data (in English)
  18. ^ "Police 3471/2006 Government Gazette 133 A'/28.06.2006" (PDF). Hellenic Say-so for Communication Security and Privacy (ADAE). Protection of personal data and privacy in the electronic telecommunications sector and amendment of constabulary 2472/1997 (in English)
  19. ^ Giannakakis, Ioannis; Vitoratos, Stefanos (Oct 10, 2019). "Hellenic republic cyber security laws and regulations". Global Legal Grouping (ICLG) UK, The International Corporate Legal Guides and International Business organization Reports. Retrieved January 1, 2020. Contributing firm: Yard+P Law Firm Athens, Greece, world wide web.gplawfirm.eu (in English)
  20. ^ "Cyber security laws and regulations of country jurisdiction capacity 2020". Global Legal Grouping (ICLG) Britain. Retrieved February one, 2020. (in English)
  21. ^ a b c d e "SURAT PEKELILING IKHTISAS BIL. 2/2009: PENGUATKUASAAN LARANGAN MEMBAWA DAN MENGGUNA TELEFON BIMBIT OLEH MURID DI SEKOLAH" [PROFESSIONAL CIRCULAR LETTER NO. two/2009: ENFORCEMENT OF THE PROHIBITION ON THE BRINGING AND USING OF MOBILE PHONES BY STUDENTS IN Schoolhouse] (PDF) (in Malay). 2009-03-25. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-08-22. Retrieved 2022-03-09 .
  22. ^ В школах Туркменистана запретили мобильные телефоны
  23. ^ Doward, Jamie (May 17, 2015). "Schools that ban mobile phones see better academic results". The Guardian . Retrieved April xix, 2019.
  24. ^ Kottasova, Ivana (May 18, 2015). "Kids do a lot better when schools ban smartphones". CNN Concern . Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  25. ^ Hymas, Charles (June 24, 2018). "Secondary schools are introducing strict new bans on mobile phones". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved April 21, 2019.
  26. ^ "Mobile phones 'should be banned from schools', minister says". The Independent. 2019-02-02. Retrieved 2019-04-21 .
  27. ^ Corbett, Stephen. "No, mobile phones should not exist banned in United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland schools". The Conversation . Retrieved Apr 21, 2019.
  28. ^ Mason, Chris (2019-02-02). "Ban phones in schools, says minister". BBC . Retrieved April 21, 2019.
  29. ^ Bong, Mary Ann; Weimar, Holly; Van Roekel, James (2013). School Librarians and the Technology Department: A Practical Guide to Successful Collaboration. ABC-CLIO. p. 33. ISBN978-1-58683-540-eight.
  30. ^ Koebler, Jason (October 17, 2012). "FCC Cracks Down on Cell Telephone 'Jammers'". U.S. News . Retrieved Apr nineteen, 2019.
  31. ^ "School scraps cell phone jammer program". KHQ Q6. March 10, 2009. Retrieved Apr nineteen, 2019.
  32. ^ "Teacher suspended for jamming students' cellphones". abc 7 Chicago. June four, 2015. Retrieved Apr nineteen, 2019.
  33. ^ a b c d e f Taylor, Kate (Jan 6, 2015). "Ban on Cellphones in New York City Schools to Be Lifted". The New York Times . Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  34. ^ a b c Blau, Edgar Sandoval, Dale Eisinger, Reuven. "Section of Education lifts ban on cell phones in New York Urban center schools". nydailynews.com . Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  35. ^ "Future for prison cell phones in classrooms?". UPI. February xx, 2009. Retrieved Apr 19, 2019.
  36. ^ Stamm, Dan (January 11, 2012). "High Schoolhouse Cell Phone Theft Ring Busted". NBC ten Philadelphia . Retrieved April nineteen, 2019.
  37. ^ Higgins, Josh (August 7, 2013). "More schools employ cellphones as learning tools". USA Today . Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  38. ^ Harris, Elizabeth A. (January 13, 2016). "Bronx Science Bans Cellphones From Wi-Fi equally Students Devour It". The New York Times . Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  39. ^ "Distracted Driving". Governors Highway Safety Association . Retrieved April xix, 2019.
  40. ^ Solis, Steph (October 28, 2015). "School bus commuter fired for speeding, texting". App . Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  41. ^ "School Motorbus Driver Suspended Later on Cellphone Video Shows Her Texting". ABC News. September 20, 2013. Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  42. ^ "13 of the Best Apps for High Schoolhouse Students". The Tech Edvocate. 2018-02-06. Retrieved April nineteen, 2019.
  43. ^ a b "Applied science in the Classroom: The Good and Bad". HuffPost. 2013-01-17. Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  44. ^ "GroupMe - App Review". www.commonsensemedia.org. 2016-03-16. Retrieved April xix, 2019.
  45. ^ a b "The Pros and Cons of Using Technology to Communicate with K-12 Parents". Otus. 2018-01-17. Retrieved April 19, 2019.

External links [edit]

  • Cell Phones in American High Schools: A National Survey, Journal of Technology Studies
  • Huang, G. (2013). Research Issues and Applications of Mobile and Ubiquitous Learning

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_use_in_schools

Posted by: thompsonfacticked.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Might Be The Reason That The School Forbids The Use Of Cell Phone Cameras?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel